Data Use Agreement Fdp

Also, see the UCSB Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) Guide here to navigate records issues. You will view a portfolio of agreements page that identifies (in alphabetical order) certain types of research, research projects, and service agreements sponsored by UT Arlington, including downloadable and editable templates, with cross-references to UTA Research Administration departments and resources if you need to contact someone for more information. 8 Structure of the DTUA modelThe Fascine page contains the information and terms that must be incorporated into each DTUA, regardless of the type of data. Appendix 1 contains information on the specific characteristics of the project, such as .B. a description of the data transferred, a description of the project for which the use of the data is authorised and information on the reimbursement of costs, if necessary. Annex 2 contains the conditions that are necessary because of the specific nature of the information transmitted, if any. Annex 3 contains information on the involvement of third parties approved by the provider. Example of Schedule 1: This Annex contains, for example, any specific requirements relating to the IRB`s authorization for the use of human data or the obligation not to attempt to re-identify individuals in the case of anonymized human data. Working on campus can be better suited to other concepts and models. For example, a sponsor may, at its sole discretion, support certain on-campus course projects, such as .B. senior design or capstone courses. A sponsor may submit one or more interesting questions, proposed project-specific outcomes, and one or more mentors available for the duration of each course project. The Sponsor may provide financial resources or borrow certain tools, software, etc.

necessary for success. At the end of each course project, the sponsor receives the results of the students, subject to the pedagogical use and prior consent of the students. Like a GRA, the disclosure of sensitive and confidential information about sponsors or IP address to the university or a student is usually neither required nor expected. As the name suggests, this agreement includes a loan of certain equipment to or from or with UT Arlington. 12 DTUA Pilot Targets Collect information on how forms best serve their purposes Confirm whether the model has the desired outcome to reduce the administrative burden of data sharing Gather feedback on changes to models and/or usage methods needed to maximize benefits. When we hear that the same terms need to be changed very frequently, we will prioritize efforts to update these terms to increase efficiency When research data is subject to federal and institutional regulatory requirements for research activities involving human subjects, live vertebrates and recombinant DNA, the Regulatory Services Office (RS), as appropriate, to support the institutional review committee (IRB – Human Subjects) approval process for applicable research. Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC – Animal Subjects) and Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC – recombinant DNA). 6 Current DTUA designed for these data exchange scenarios: The transfer/sharing of research data from the sponsoring institution to a recipient institution for use in a research project at the recipient institution. Transmission/disclosure of types of data that do not require terms other than those opposite, anonymized data on human persons or a limited set of data. (Versions that can be used for sharing personal data will be available soon!) Currently, not for bidirectional data flow, use when transferring materials, sharing data from a repository, or when third-party rights incompatible with the terms of the model are likely to be added to the data. 5 The DTUA model aims to reduce the loadThe volume and complexity of DTUAs running to exchange research data are increasing.

The DTUA model was created as a first step towards improving quality and creating greater consistency in terms of reference and format to reduce the associated administrative burden. A low-effort method of data sharing that cannot be made public will be particularly important to help institutions comply with sponsors` data sharing requirements. The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize and document a transfer or formal transfer of research data from a sponsoring institution to a recipient institution for use in a research project at the recipient institution. Research data can be of several different types (e.B. anonymized data of human subjects, a limited data set, and personally identifiable information according to HIPAA and FERPA). Data Use Agreements (DUAs) are agreements that may restrict the use or disclosure of data and/or impose data security measures, in addition to addressing other legal issues. Additional resources on data resources, services, and policies are available under library.stonybrook.edu/scholarly-communication/data – Services / Some institutions may choose not to participate with the FDP format, or data sharing may require additional conditions to be effective, such as for a sub.B for a funded sub-price. In these cases, a review is conducted by the agreement management in collaboration with the corresponding resources of the research administration. A license agreement is used for an external party to pay royalties and expenses to UT Arlington to commercialize ut Arlington`s proprietary technology, which is almost always patented or patent pending, but this agreement may include the license of trade secrets and know-how.

For the other member institutes of UT System, we have a framework agreement as a single and simple option for the exchange of data and materials. Many faculties that are members of the UT system have requested a combined framework agreement for the transfer of material from the UT system containing data. In the following forms, you will find a modified and customized Final Material and Data Transfer Agreement (MDTA-Framework) for the 14 institutions of the UT system, as well as an interactive PDF file on the implementation of the Framework Agreement, which replaces the previous implementation letter and promises to be easier to use. .